SILBERBAUER SAYS:

The Dark Side of Web 2.0  

Klaus Silberbauer / Thursday, March 08, 2007

Wikipedia shows us that the combined knowledge of man is incredible and that Web 2.0 technologies can be used for something truly great.

But don't forget that Wikis aren't inherently good in any way - the very same technologies may be used for spreading stupidity and idiocy. Although it seems that to use Web 2.0 technology for that kind of misinformation you'll have to control who's contributing - to keep all us liberals out, you know. So, where Wikipedia is for all of us to edit, the fundamentalist Christian alternatives are not. And it makes sense: If they opened the door, saneness would be pouring in from all over the web.

On Conservapedia (a right-wing christian answer to the "liberal biased" Wikipedia) I stumpled upon a very short article on Thomas Edison which I'd found could benefit from some improvements. Among other things, I'd liked to add that Edison was a an atheist. But, as I'd expected, I am was not allowed to create an account on Conservapedia - I guess it's only for American folks of the faith and keepers of the truth.

Wikipedia is biased, Conservapedia says. How about this description of "Atheism" in Conservapedia:

"Atheism is closely tied with Secular Humanism. Popularly-known Atheists and Secular Humanists include Stephen Hawking, Albert Einstein, Stephen Jay Gould, Carl Sagan, Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris. Other famous atheists include Pol Pot and Stalin." [...] "No atheist has ever been elected leader of a democracy. The only political systems under the control of atheists are totalitarian and/or communist"

Biased? Naah.

Other scary reads are:

Conservapedia on "Dinosaurs", Conservapedia on "God", Conservapedia on "Liberal"

Also, don't miss out on CreationWiki on Dinosaurs which answers that old question of how Noah did manage to make room for those bulky dinos inside the ark? Well:

It should be noted that although the Biblical description of Noah's ark states it as large enough to host even the largest known specimens of dinosaurs, it is logical that younger / smaller varieties were taken aboard. Reptiles are the only terrestrial vertebrate that continuously grows as long as they live. Mammals on the other hand, have an adolescent period following which there is no further growth. Therefore, it is arguable that many of these "terrible lizards" were simply much older than modern varieties.

Mind boggling.